Carfection1.01 млн
Опубликовано 23 января 2013, 9:02
To see our latest film before it's on YouTube: carfection.com
Subscribe for more XCAR videos: bit.ly/U9XDKc
Muscle cars. They're not really for the likes of us Europeans. They're big, thirsty and a bit silly for our refined, hatch-loving tastes. We like small cars with economical engines designed to pootle around our tight, windy city roads and ever narrowing A-Roads. Oh, who the hell am I kidding? Give me a choice between a European Econobox and a RWD 6.2-litre V8 Chevy Camaro and the first set of keys taken will start the one that kills the most flowers.
The Chevrolet Camaro is a bit of a stand out car at the moment. Its motor show debut showed the world that Ford hadn't got the retro-styling thing entirely to itself and that Chevrolet could really inspire the car buying public with something stunning (that isn't a Corvette). A tie-in with the much-hyped feature length toy commercial, Transformers, meant that all of a sudden it wasn't simply a Camaro any more: it was Bumblebee.
I'm not ashamed to say that this generation of Camaro is Bumblebee to me, too. When I first saw Transformers I wanted to drive one -- it looked so cool, so new and so good that I went a bit wobbly.
It's a modern/retro take on the Mk 1 Camaro (the best looking of the retro 'Maros), the car Chevrolet designed to spank the popular ford Mustang in the 60's. It didn't. It lost in a big way. Subsequent generations weren't much cop either -- the fourth generation did so poorly that Chevrolet decided to kill the name off...
...Only to resurrect it in 2009 to take on the newly popular retro Mustang. For round two, though, I hear the Camaro is winning the muscle car race. That's one for the books.
Having a go in one was a bit of an "I've waited years for this" moment. You know what? I wish it had stayed as one, too. The Camaro, as a car, is awful. Every bit of the basic Camaro is terrible: the fittings, suspension, noise, trim... you name it. I suspect it's because they're cripplingly expensive to import to the UK and the bits that make it drive as you'd hope are bit on the dear side.
In the same breath as saying it's terrible, though, it really isn't. Because it's a Camaro. Kids stare, adults look in wonderment, its size cuts a pretty nice path through busy traffic. I mean, just look at it -- You're driving BUMBLEBEE for pete's sake. That's worth all the wobbly suspension in the world.
Specs
Engine: 6.2-litre V8
Power: 400bhp
Torque: 410lb ft
0-62mph: 5.6seconds
Top speed: 155mph
Join the XCAR community...
Like on Facebook: on.fb.me/Yo8eOz
Follow on Twitter: bit.ly/WGBljw
Follow on Pinterest: bit.ly/158X4Uk
VIDEOS IN ENDBOARD
Caterham Supersport: bit.ly/16mtaAu
Subscribe for more XCAR videos: bit.ly/U9XDKc
Muscle cars. They're not really for the likes of us Europeans. They're big, thirsty and a bit silly for our refined, hatch-loving tastes. We like small cars with economical engines designed to pootle around our tight, windy city roads and ever narrowing A-Roads. Oh, who the hell am I kidding? Give me a choice between a European Econobox and a RWD 6.2-litre V8 Chevy Camaro and the first set of keys taken will start the one that kills the most flowers.
The Chevrolet Camaro is a bit of a stand out car at the moment. Its motor show debut showed the world that Ford hadn't got the retro-styling thing entirely to itself and that Chevrolet could really inspire the car buying public with something stunning (that isn't a Corvette). A tie-in with the much-hyped feature length toy commercial, Transformers, meant that all of a sudden it wasn't simply a Camaro any more: it was Bumblebee.
I'm not ashamed to say that this generation of Camaro is Bumblebee to me, too. When I first saw Transformers I wanted to drive one -- it looked so cool, so new and so good that I went a bit wobbly.
It's a modern/retro take on the Mk 1 Camaro (the best looking of the retro 'Maros), the car Chevrolet designed to spank the popular ford Mustang in the 60's. It didn't. It lost in a big way. Subsequent generations weren't much cop either -- the fourth generation did so poorly that Chevrolet decided to kill the name off...
...Only to resurrect it in 2009 to take on the newly popular retro Mustang. For round two, though, I hear the Camaro is winning the muscle car race. That's one for the books.
Having a go in one was a bit of an "I've waited years for this" moment. You know what? I wish it had stayed as one, too. The Camaro, as a car, is awful. Every bit of the basic Camaro is terrible: the fittings, suspension, noise, trim... you name it. I suspect it's because they're cripplingly expensive to import to the UK and the bits that make it drive as you'd hope are bit on the dear side.
In the same breath as saying it's terrible, though, it really isn't. Because it's a Camaro. Kids stare, adults look in wonderment, its size cuts a pretty nice path through busy traffic. I mean, just look at it -- You're driving BUMBLEBEE for pete's sake. That's worth all the wobbly suspension in the world.
Specs
Engine: 6.2-litre V8
Power: 400bhp
Torque: 410lb ft
0-62mph: 5.6seconds
Top speed: 155mph
Join the XCAR community...
Like on Facebook: on.fb.me/Yo8eOz
Follow on Twitter: bit.ly/WGBljw
Follow on Pinterest: bit.ly/158X4Uk
VIDEOS IN ENDBOARD
Caterham Supersport: bit.ly/16mtaAu
Свежие видео
Случайные видео