Is there an advantage to using rel="canonical" over a 301 redirect?
54 005
145.2
Google Webmasters675 тыс
Следующее
12.04.11 – 15 5251:34Популярные
361 день – 2 12431:17
09.08.23 – 28 28312:57Опубликовано 12 апреля 2011, 3:19
Hey Matt. I had a lingering question about using rel=canonical vs. 301 redirects. It takes longer for Google to find the rel=canonical pages but 301 redirects seem to lose impact (link juice) over time. Is there similar churn with rel=canonical? Sam Crocker, London, UK
Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: google.com/support/forum/p/Web...
Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: twitter.com/googlewmc
More videos: youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHel...
Webmaster Central Blog: googlewebmastercentral.blogspo...
Webmaster Central: google.com/webmasters
Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: google.com/support/forum/p/Web...
Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: twitter.com/googlewmc
More videos: youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHel...
Webmaster Central Blog: googlewebmastercentral.blogspo...
Webmaster Central: google.com/webmasters
Свежие видео
4 дня – 2 2040:15
5 дней – 40 78514:57
6 дней – 982 4451:00
6 дней – 3612:03
6 дней – 1 2720:32Случайные видео
104 дня – 6 2520:10
127 дней – 28 18420:25
178 дней – 258 1690:30
08.05.22 – 41 6037:59
10.02.22 – 1 2502:49
22.06.08 – 33 5582:16
4 дня – 40 81927:39
5 дней – 13 0970:27
6 дней – 215 9451:16:20
6 дней – 141 56126:46
7 дней – 4 77813:13
3 дня – 2 2790:06