Is there an advantage to using rel="canonical" over a 301 redirect?
54 022
145.2
Google Webmasters681 тыс
Следующее
12.04.11 – 15 5361:34Популярные
25.08.22 – 8 51229:07
22.03.22 – 8 0361:01:24Опубликовано 12 апреля 2011, 3:19
Hey Matt. I had a lingering question about using rel=canonical vs. 301 redirects. It takes longer for Google to find the rel=canonical pages but 301 redirects seem to lose impact (link juice) over time. Is there similar churn with rel=canonical? Sam Crocker, London, UK
Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: google.com/support/forum/p/Web...
Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: twitter.com/googlewmc
More videos: youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHel...
Webmaster Central Blog: googlewebmastercentral.blogspo...
Webmaster Central: google.com/webmasters
Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: google.com/support/forum/p/Web...
Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: twitter.com/googlewmc
More videos: youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHel...
Webmaster Central Blog: googlewebmastercentral.blogspo...
Webmaster Central: google.com/webmasters
Свежие видео
4 дня – 5810:21
6 дней – 139 1408:13
7 дней – 3 9671:34
9 дней – 9 4700:06
10 дней – 1 00121:20Случайные видео
24 дня – 2 2921:44
148 дней – 68 41010:14
06.12.23 – 1 0470:32
02.06.23 – 5 3360:15
23.09.22 – 2 73014:38
13.07.20 – 107 1103:47
4 дня – 6480:27
9 дней – 31322:30
9 дней – 18 6650:21
10 дней – 8 7360:09
10 дней – 2 2162:02
1 день – 9 1630:54