Is there an advantage to using rel="canonical" over a 301 redirect?
53 987
145.1
Google Webmasters664 тыс
Следующее
12.04.11 – 15 5051:34Популярные
28.01.21 – 2 7451:07:45
21.01.21 – 6 483 3133:17Опубликовано 12 апреля 2011, 3:19
Hey Matt. I had a lingering question about using rel=canonical vs. 301 redirects. It takes longer for Google to find the rel=canonical pages but 301 redirects seem to lose impact (link juice) over time. Is there similar churn with rel=canonical? Sam Crocker, London, UK
Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: google.com/support/forum/p/Web...
Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: twitter.com/googlewmc
More videos: youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHel...
Webmaster Central Blog: googlewebmastercentral.blogspo...
Webmaster Central: google.com/webmasters
Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: google.com/support/forum/p/Web...
Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: twitter.com/googlewmc
More videos: youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHel...
Webmaster Central Blog: googlewebmastercentral.blogspo...
Webmaster Central: google.com/webmasters
Свежие видео
1 день – 6432:00
Случайные видео
24 дня – 5 196 1431:54
179 дней – 227 6578:43
354 дня – 61 9781:08
29.07.23 – 166 73615:26
31.05.21 – 2 181 1861:11
03.04.18 – 310 8589:48
6 дней – 1 24942:38
14 дней – 26118:22
14 дней – 1451:49
14 дней – 1 5493:47
15 дней – 2305:42
22 дня – 6 242 74411:21
22 дня – 5 85115:44
12 часов – 343 2510:53